FoRK-thee?

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Grlygrl201@aol.com
Date: Wed Nov 29 2000 - 05:14:27 PST


dissed by magi

   ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----
cameron@alphanumerica.com
    (expanded from: FoRK-thee)
dab@organicmachines.com
    (expanded from: FoRK-thee)
gbolcer@endTECH.com
    (expanded from: FoRK-too)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
451 dab@organicmachines.com... organicmachines.com: Name server timeout
cameron@alphanumerica.com... Deferred: Connection timed out with
ns2.alphanumerica.com.
gbolcer@endTECH.com... Deferred: Connection refused by mail.magisoftware.com.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old

--------------------
Final-Recipient: RFC822; FoRK-thee@XeNT.ics.uci.edu
X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; cameron@alphanumerica.com
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; ns2.alphanumerica.com
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Will-Retry-Until: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:35:46 -0800 (PST)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; FoRK-thee@XeNT.ics.uci.edu
X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; dab@organicmachines.com
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.3
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Will-Retry-Until: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:35:46 -0800 (PST)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; FoRK-too@XeNT.ics.uci.edu
X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; gbolcer@endtech.com
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.magisoftware.com
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Will-Retry-Until: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:35:46 -0800 (PST)

--------------------
Return-Path: <Grlygrl201@aol.com>
Received: from green.mydomain.com (208.184.130.53.namesdirect.com
[208.184.130.53])
    by XeNT.ics.uci.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA14708
    for <fork@xent.ics.uci.edu>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:35:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Grlygrl201@aol.com
Received: from imo-r10.mx.aol.com (imo-r10.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.10])
    by green.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455E42BB74
    for <FoRK@xent.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:20:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Grlygrl201@aol.com
    by imo-r10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.34.) id c.9.d8e9902 (26122);
    Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:21:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <9.d8e9902.2755d03a@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:21:30 EST
Subject: Re: confederacy of dunces*
To: lucas@worldos.com, FoRK@xent.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 67

In a message dated 11/28/00 6:36:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
lucas@worldos.com writes:

<< and we still don't have manual recounts of the areas with the worst
machines, so
 the ballots have not been counted and recounted. >>

machines haven't yet been evaluated for "worseness." judge n. sanders sauls
just ordered sample machines to be delivered to tallytown for his assessment.
 :-)

(this judge actually said "i want to be equally unfair to all the parties"
when harris's counsel objected to the too-soon date for a hearing, and he got
a laugh! things are just beginning to get interesting . . . )


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 29 2000 - 05:20:25 PST