Re: Humans may be monogamous

From: cdale@silly.techmonkeys.net
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 07:26:45 PST

• Next message: Lorin Rivers: "Re: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."
• Previous message: Rahul Dave: "Florida: does no-one think error bar"
• In reply to: Tony Finch: "Re: Humans may be monogamous"

On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Tony Finch wrote:

> "Joseph S. Barrera III" <joe@barrera.org> wrote:
> >> Do we get to go back to 100 message/day arguments on who gets
> >> to sleep with who now?
> >
> >whom
>
> Do we get to go back to 100 message/day arguments on who gets
> to flame who about their grammar?

who gets to flame whom.

>
> Tony.
> --
> f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@covalent.net Chad for President!
>

• Next message: Lorin Rivers: "Re: Seems as if fork would beat spam..."
• Previous message: Rahul Dave: "Florida: does no-one think error bar"
• In reply to: Tony Finch: "Re: Humans may be monogamous"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 18 2000 - 07:32:09 PST