> It occurred to me a couple of days ago that Russell's Paradox can be
> described quite nicely in terms of web pages and links. It seems easier to
> conceptualize than sets containing themselves as members.
by members of a mailing list who can't conceptualize sets?
Surely you jest.
L.
<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.sat-net.com/L.Wood/>+44-1483-300800x3641