Re: Market-leader absence in standards (Was: RE: Network World: IMPPlosion)

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mark Baker (mbaker@cpu2164.adsl.bellglobal.com)
Date: Tue Dec 19 2000 - 13:56:07 PST

Next message: Mark Day: "RE: Network World: IMPPlosion"
Previous message: Tom Whore: "Re: guns (Re: Cell phones of death!)"
In reply to: Lisa Dusseault: "Market-leader absence in standards (Was: RE: Network World: IMPPlosion)"
Next in thread: Mark Day: "RE: Market-leader absence in standards (Was: RE: Network World: IMPPlosion)"
Next in thread: Gordon Mohr: "Re: Network World: IMPPlosion"

> Forced
> cooperation is rarely effective cooperation. Thus, I've become a proponent
> of, yet again, competition.

Who says "forced cooperation" is non-competitive?

MB

Next message: Mark Day: "RE: Network World: IMPPlosion"
Previous message: Tom Whore: "Re: guns (Re: Cell phones of death!)"
In reply to: Lisa Dusseault: "Market-leader absence in standards (Was: RE: Network World: IMPPlosion)"
Next in thread: Mark Day: "RE: Market-leader absence in standards (Was: RE: Network World: IMPPlosion)"
Next in thread: Gordon Mohr: "Re: Network World: IMPPlosion"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 19 2000 - 13:54:28 PST