Re: [Washington Post] Printing's Future May Be Written in E Ink.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Tim Byars: "Old skool FoRK"
• Previous message: Tim Byars: "RE: [Washington Post] Printing's Future May Be Written in E Ink."
• In reply to: I Find Karma: "[Washington Post] Printing's Future May Be Written in E Ink."
• Next in thread: Tom Whore: "Re: [Washington Post] Printing's Future May Be Written in E Ink."

> Jacobson is completely right: nothing beats paper for presentation of
> information.

The only reason this is currently true, imho, is because most display
software tries to emulate paper instead of doing something new.

If you run Linux, give GNU sview a try (warning, though -- we're still in
beta): <http://acm.cs.umr.edu/~gnu-sview/>

• Next message: Tim Byars: "Old skool FoRK"
• Previous message: Tim Byars: "RE: [Washington Post] Printing's Future May Be Written in E Ink."
• In reply to: I Find Karma: "[Washington Post] Printing's Future May Be Written in E Ink."
• Next in thread: Tom Whore: "Re: [Washington Post] Printing's Future May Be Written in E Ink."