Re: transcendence

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Mike Masnick (mike@techdirt.com)
Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 13:08:08 PDT


At 01:46 PM 5/15/00 -0600, Tom Sweetnam wrote:
>cdale wrote:
>
>> It's 42, dammit.
>
>47...42...what better example of transcendence is there than that? ;-)

And of course, Richard Feynman at one point declares that it's 64 (though,
I guess he's actually talking about the "value" of life, and not the
"meaning"). But, I have to side with him 'cause he's American and I'm
blindly patriotic, and he taught at Cornell, even if he hated it.

 -Mike


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 13:11:37 PDT