Re: Consumption 2: The Return (With New and Improved Definitions and Proofs!)

From: Jeff Bone (jbone@jump.net)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 07:48:42 PST

Grlygrl201@aol.com wrote:

> their notions procede
> from a dichotomy labeled "fair" and "unfair."

Geege, Geege. Obviously not true even to the most casual observer. We have
already developed whole spectrum of dichotomies in this conversation, including
"EQUITABLE / EQUITABLE-2," "FAIR," "MORAL / VOLUNTARY," "REASONABLE /
CONSISTENT," "EXPEDIENT," and "SUFFICIENT" and their respective complements just
for starters.

;-)

jb

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:15:15 PDT