And lo, Matt Jensen saith unto us:
> I see what you're saying, but did you see this part:
>
> "The suspect tried to escape the gunfire by diving under the SUV, but was
> shot several times and died under the vehicle with his revolver a few feet
> away on the pavement."
>
> If the suspect was no longer a threat to the victim, he loses his
> self-defense protection. I presume the relevant points would be:
>
> 1. how far away was the suspect's gun?
> 2. how long after he dove under the SUV did the victim shoot him?
> 3. how many times did he shoot him?
> 4. did the victim reasonably know that the suspect no longer had his gun?
> etc.
Throw in a "you don't look so bad, here have another" and you're toast.
(I'm sure I didn't quote that right, but that's okay, Wayne will come
to the rescue)
- Joe
Manic and depressed at the same time is a bad state to be in
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:15:13 PDT